Under the Senator's amendment, would he not agree with me that rather than to have three interpretative rulings on--I forget what it was the Senator said; three rulings for events? Would you really have to have an interpretative ruling on each and every event you go to, if you are going to be safe?
Questioning the necessity of multiple interpretative rulings during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from John Johnston
I commend the Senator from Wyoming for a very powerful statement on the subject of the starvation, from a budgetary standpoint, of the national parks. He is surely, surely correct on that issue. Mr. President, I hope all of my colleagues…
Let me ask the Senator, if what you say is true that 99.999 percent of the people in the country think ``these trips,'' you have in mind some trips other than what I have in mind----
I rise in strong support of the bill and in opposition, reluctant opposition, to the amendment of my friend from Wyoming. As I said this morning, his point, which is that the National Park Service is underfunded at this time, is a very…
Take whatever you want to. Let us say the tobacco industry goes to wherever you want to go to and they have fun and they do not do any serious work, we will say that is a bad trip. If you had to disclose that, do you think any Senator is…
Other voices in this conversation
