The gentleman is fundamentally correct. It was not the intent of the committee to interpret the facts of the situation but rather to highlight the problem for future action.
Edward Livingston: “The gentleman is fundamentally correct. It was not the intent of the committee to interpret the facts of the situation…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the intent of a committee regarding a specific issue.
Share
More from Edward Livingston
I certainly rise to support his bill. It is one of the most important bills in the appropriations process, at least from the standpoint of a Member who lives in New Orleans, in the center of the Mississippi River Valley watershed, because…
Will the gentleman acknowledge that despite the passage of some 5 years' of time the Russians have yet to even ratify START II, let alone START III?
I would point out that this gentleman shares the concern of the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer) about extraneous issues. That is why we divided the U.N. arrearages, the IMF, and the abortion lobbying restrictions and put them on a…
The amendment before the committee would provide $20 million for HUD's Community Development Block Grant Program to assist in the recovery from the recent Northeastern U.S. ice storm. This storm caused damage to property and utilities in…





