However, I might add that, as the gentleman knows, for this year and in years past we have continued to appropriate within the discretionary budget limits which are being reduced more and more and more. The fact is that this Congress, since the 104th Congress was sworn in, has saved the American taxpayer, within the discretionary portion of the budget, some $20 billion under what we would have spent in original fiscal year 1995 level, and another $22 to $30 billion below that level in fiscal year 1996 already. So we are on that glidepath toward a balanced budget, but the gentleman is correct. A line-item veto would enhance our ability to do so, and I appreciate his position.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget savings and the need for a line-item veto during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Edward Livingston
The amendment before the committee would provide $20 million for HUD's Community Development Block Grant Program to assist in the recovery from the recent Northeastern U.S. ice storm. This storm caused damage to property and utilities in…
the amendment does not specifically relate to that. However, it is our expectation, and the understanding of all of the task force members, that in accordance with precedent the Committee will determine by majority vote which, if any…
the gentlewoman who just spoke cares deeply about the lives of the constituents that she represents and about the welfare of this great city. I think to charge the majority with the label of being ideologically motivated, though, is…
Mr. Chairman, actually this amendment is offered by the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. Cardin] and myself in bipartisan fashion. Basically it serves to overcome an anomaly that might have been created were it not adopted, in that the…





