Is that in some meaningful form not required by law, a 20-year outlook?
David Vitter: “Is that in some meaningful form not required by law, a 20-year outlook?”
Editor's note · Context
Senator Vitter emphasizes the legal requirement for a 20-year outlook.
Share
More from David Vitter
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds.
I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…
Thank you, Mr. President. I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Lee). The Senator from Texas. Zika Virus Funding





