On the recordNovember 30, 2010
It should be easy to all agree on clarifying language saying that anything from that 2010 Appropriations Act inconsistent with the new 2010 Authorization Act will have no force and effect.
Source
congress.govDavid Vitter: “It should be easy to all agree on clarifying language saying that anything from that 2010 Appropriations Act…”
Editor's note · Context
Advocating for clarifying language in new legislation regarding NASA funding.
Share
More from David Vitter
Sep 19, 2016
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
Sep 19, 2016
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
Jun 7, 2016
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
Sep 12, 2016
I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.
Other voices in this conversation
