I would suggest, through the Chair to the distinguished majority leader, that I have a real problem with depending on basically the other side's summary of these changes which are being made as we speak. So I would propound a new unanimous consent request, that if we have to do that, if that summary is lacking or inaccurate in any way, that all subsequent votes and actions of the Senate which are agreed to have no effect because we have depended on the other side's information and it could turn out to have been incomplete or inaccurate.
David Vitter: “I would suggest, through the Chair to the distinguished majority leader, that I have a real problem with depending on…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about reliance on the opposing party's summary of legislative changes.
Share
More from David Vitter
I rise to bring up two key priorities-- two important unmet needs--which I hope this body and the U.S. House will act on immediately and certainly by the end of the year. The first is the Steve Gleason Act, legislation I drafted which…
I ask unanimous consent that the Select Committee on Intelligence be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 9 a.m., in room SH-216 of the Hart Senate Office Building. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without…
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 10 a.m., in room SD-226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without…
The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds.





