Political Quotes

David Vitter: this is amendment No. 3277, and it is very simple and straightforward and, I believe, very needed. The amendment would…

On the recordOctober 15, 2007
this is amendment No. 3277, and it is very simple and straightforward and, I believe, very needed. The amendment would simply prohibit COPS funding, which is governed under this bill, from going to so-called sanctuary cities. In doing so, it would do nothing more than to enforce current Federal law. Mr. President, as you know, in 1996, Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. In that 1996 legislation, which is current law, there is a very clear section on sanctuary city policy. It is section 642(a), and it states in clear unmistakable terms: Federal, State or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual. Mr. President, the idea behind that policy is very simple. Law enforcement around the country should be free to cooperate with Federal authorities regarding immigration, regarding immigration enforcement, and no State or local government should be able to contradict Federal law by establishing a State or local law which bars this sort of commonsense cooperation.
Said by
David Vitter
Republican · Louisiana

Editor's note · Context

Discussing an amendment to prohibit COPS funding for sanctuary cities.

Share

More from David Vitter

Sep 7, 2016

I rise today to highlight the importance and urgent need of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 and the urgent need to bring it to the Senate floor and to act and pass it in the Senate. Unfortunately, there are many events, floods…

govinfo.gov
Sep 19, 2016

Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?

congress.gov
Sep 19, 2016

Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?

congress.gov
May 26, 2016

I ask unanimous consent that since Senator Inhofe and I will speak on the same important topic, we speak back to back for up to 15 minutes total. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered. Frank R…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation