On the recordApril 10, 2013
Shouldn't an affected group like the States, for instance, on the regional haze issue, shouldn't they have a seat at the table?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter emphasizes the need for states to be involved in settlement discussions.
Share
More from David Vitter
May 26, 2016
we rise together with so many other Members of the Senate on a bipartisan basis to strongly support the chemical safety bill which passed the U.S. House of Representatives with enormous bipartisan support and is ready to pass here in the…
Jun 7, 2016
When TSCA was first enacted in 1976, the Act created a higher level of judicial review for certain rulemakings that would restrict chemicals in commerce. Congress took this approach because it wanted to ensure that rulemakings that would…
Jun 16, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 10 a.m., in room SD-226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without…
Jun 7, 2016
That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…
Other voices in this conversation
