I would urge you to go look at that and maybe supplement your answer because if what you say is true, and I hope it is, then it is just sort of a useless time-consuming question and then why not take it out and not make people, you know, answer another question which really does not have to do with the two criteria we laid out.
Vitter questions the necessity of a subjective public benefit criterion in project applications.
Share
More from David Vitter
The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds.
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
Thank you, Mr. President. I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Lee). The Senator from Texas. Zika Virus Funding
Other voices in this conversation
