On the recordSeptember 29, 2015
I do not think an entity like FDIC would have spent tens of millions of dollars to do back-somersaults to make those sorts of arguments.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter questions FDIC's spending on legal arguments, suggesting industry influence.
Share
More from David Vitter
May 26, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that since Senator Inhofe and I will speak on the same important topic, we speak back to back for up to 15 minutes total. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered. Frank R…
May 24, 2016
the picture a lot of us see, a majority of us see since the deal that we disagreed with was Iran taking negative actions, horrible actions in some cases against us and our allies, particularly in the categories of terrorism, human rights…
Jun 7, 2016
Thank you Senator Inhofe, the sound science provisions were a critical part of TSCA reform in my opinion and I hope this bill serves as a model for how to responsibly reform other laws administered by EPA and other Federal Agencies that…
Sep 12, 2016
I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.
Other voices in this conversation
