On the recordJune 15, 2009
So again, under Option 1, that would not change. Under Option 2, it would completely change for the better.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter discusses the implications of two options on canal wall designs.
Share
More from David Vitter
May 26, 2016
let me say that I regret an objection to this very reasonable path forward. No one objects to all Members of the Senate reading the bill. I encourage all Members of the Senate to read the bill. There has been and is continuing opportunity…
Jun 16, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Armed Services be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. committee on foreign relations
Jun 7, 2016
When TSCA was first enacted in 1976, the Act created a higher level of judicial review for certain rulemakings that would restrict chemicals in commerce. Congress took this approach because it wanted to ensure that rulemakings that would…
Nov 29, 2016
I ask unanimous consent all time be yielded back. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, all time is yielded back. The bill was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading and was read the third time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the…
Other voices in this conversation
