On the recordJuly 30, 2013
I think you have made it clear that those are decoupled. I think that is a big step forward from the current law.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter praises the bill's clarity in separating safety assessments from cost analysis.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 7, 2016
Thank you, Senator Inhofe, for those important clarifications to preemption and for another question that is very important to clarify in order to capture the full conngressional intent of the bills preemption section. This Act is intended…
Sep 7, 2016
I rise today to highlight the importance and urgent need of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 and the urgent need to bring it to the Senate floor and to act and pass it in the Senate. Unfortunately, there are many events, floods…
Jun 7, 2016
That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…
Sep 12, 2016
I think it was really, unfortunately, underreported in the national news for various reasons.
Other voices in this conversation
