On the recordDecember 16, 2013
I really believe, as do my colleagues on this side, that scope should warrant a more thorough Committee review than this pretty rush one at the end of the year.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter expresses concern over the rushed review of multiple presidential nominees.
Share
More from David Vitter
Jun 16, 2016
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 10 a.m., in room SD-226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without…
Dec 1, 2016
if the majority leader will yield for one moment, I want to thank the majority leader for his very kind words. Serving in the Senate for two terms has been the highest honor of my professional career. I have enjoyed it so much and have…
Jun 7, 2016
That is a very important question and the clear intent of Congress is the answer is yes. This is because, to be legally sufficient according to EPA's own technical assistance, EPA's Section 6(a) rule must ensure that the chemical substance…
Dec 5, 2016
I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…
Other voices in this conversation
