I want to stand today in strong support of this important concurrent resolution to increase awareness of a very serious health problem, the growing gap between organ supply and demand. Last year, of the 60,000 people on organ transplant waiting lists, only 20,000 received needed transplants. As the number of patients waiting for organ transplants expands each year, clearly we must redouble our efforts to increase organ donations. In my State of Louisiana, organ and tissue donations are increasing, in large part thanks to a new and innovative computerized database that shares information on donated organs with members of the medical community and their patients. For instance, in 1999, 900 organs were donated in Louisiana, coming close to matching the nearly 1,200 Louisianans awaiting transplants. I think this represents real progress, and I am proud that my State is leading the way. However, I do remain very concerned that this administration's answer to the growing shortage across the country of organs is to attempt to federalize the organ allocation system and allow HHS bureaucrats to override medical decisions by local organ transplant groups.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need to increase organ donations and concerns over federalizing the organ allocation system.
Share
More from David Vitter
I rise today to speak on the Senate floor for the last time. I am not generally big on nostalgic reminiscences, but I would like to briefly reflect on what is clearly the greatest honor of my professional life--my 12 years in the U.S…
I ask unanimous consent that since Senator Inhofe and I will speak on the same important topic, we speak back to back for up to 15 minutes total. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered. Frank R…
I ask unanimous consent that following and notwithstanding the adoption of the compound motion to go to conference on S. 524, that Senator Shaheen and Senator Whitehouse or their designees be recognized to each offer a motion to instruct…
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…





