Political Quotes

On the recordJune 7, 2016
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this section were intended to conform closely with EPA's current practice and maintain the Agency's timely reviews that allow substances to market within the statutory deadlines. First, the compromise retains the 90-day review period for EPA to make a risk-based decision on a new chemical, without consideration of costs or other non-risk factors. Second, when EPA does not have the information sufficient for the evaluation of a new chemical, or when EPA determines that a new chemical may present an unreasonable risk, the compromise requires EPA regulate the new chemical to the extent necessary to protect against unreasonable risk. Once sufficient information is available, of course, EPA must make a decision. These requirements largely reflect EPA's practice today, under which EPA can allow the new chemical on the market but with limits. Finally, if EPA determines that a new chemical is not likely to present an unreasonable risk, EPA must make a statement to that effect before the end of the 90 day period. This provision ensures that chemicals considered not likely to pose an unreasonable risk are not delayed in getting to market.…
Said by
David Vitter
Republican · Louisiana
Source
govinfo.gov
Jun 7, 2016

Share

More from David Vitter

Jun 7, 2016

I rise also to laud a really significant achievement that we are going to finalize tonight with the final passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. This much needed bill will provide updates that have…

govinfo.gov
May 24, 2016

the picture a lot of us see, a majority of us see since the deal that we disagreed with was Iran taking negative actions, horrible actions in some cases against us and our allies, particularly in the categories of terrorism, human rights…

congress.gov
Sep 19, 2016

Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?

congress.gov
Jun 16, 2016

I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on June 16, 2016, at 11 a.m., in room 428A of the Russell Senate Office Building to conduct a hearing…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation