The sweeping language in the proposal represents a direct threat to private property rights.
David Vitter: “The sweeping language in the proposal represents a direct threat to private property rights.”
On the recordMay 18, 2015
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter warns that the proposed rule threatens property rights by expanding federal control.
Share
More from David Vitter
Dec 5, 2016
I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…
Sep 19, 2016
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
Sep 19, 2016
So just as an example, Wells is the biggest participant in the SBA's 7(a) loan program.
Jun 29, 2016
Thank you, Mr. President. I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Lee). The Senator from Texas. Zika Virus Funding





