Advocacy believes, first, the rule will impose direct costs on small businesses. Second, these costs will have a significant economic impact on those small businesses. And, third, the agencies incorrectly certified the rule and should have conducted a SBREFA panel.
David Vitter: “Advocacy believes, first, the rule will impose direct costs on small businesses. Second, these costs will have a…”
On the recordMay 18, 2015
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Vitter discusses the economic impact of the EPA's rule on small businesses.
Share
More from David Vitter
Sep 19, 2016
Why isn't this crystal clear proof that an entity as big as Wells is not only too big to fail, but it is too big to manage and it is too big to regulate?
Sep 19, 2016
Was not this practice, in fact, by the numbers part of the Wells culture by definition because it was so widespread for so long a period of time?
Dec 5, 2016
I thank the Senator from Louisiana for his very kind remarks. More importantly, I want to thank him for years of great partnership, great work on behalf of Louisiana. I know he will make an outstanding senior Senator. Thank you. I yield…
Sep 19, 2016
So just as an example, Wells is the biggest participant in the SBA's 7(a) loan program.





