I rise to strongly support American jobs and employment here at home, economic development; and because of those values and because of that focus, I strongly support the Jefferson resolution and active consideration and debate of it. U.S. port authorities, port terminal operators, longshore labor unions, other U.S. port and transportation industry organizations all have opposed President Bush's decision to impose tariffs and quotas on fairly traded steel products imported into the United States, and all of those entities are home to good, viable, important, well-paying American jobs. This is not a one-sided debate about American jobs. I am very sympathetic to U.S. steel producers and their employees, but that is not the only place jobs are impacted in terms of this action. They are impacted even more on the negative side by President Bush's decision with regard to ports and other maritime-related commerce. I know that very well from my home, the New Orleans area. Forty percent of the revenue from the port of New Orleans is directly tied to steel imports. That supports more than 8,600 jobs just within the Greater New Orleans area, and if we look at Louisiana as a whole, there are thousands more, and if we look at the Nation, there are tens of thousands more.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of tariffs on American jobs and the economy during a floor speech.
Share
More from David Vitter
the picture a lot of us see, a majority of us see since the deal that we disagreed with was Iran taking negative actions, horrible actions in some cases against us and our allies, particularly in the categories of terrorism, human rights…
Thank you Senator Inhofe, the sound science provisions were a critical part of TSCA reform in my opinion and I hope this bill serves as a model for how to responsibly reform other laws administered by EPA and other Federal Agencies that…
I rise to bring up two key priorities-- two important unmet needs--which I hope this body and the U.S. House will act on immediately and certainly by the end of the year. The first is the Steve Gleason Act, legislation I drafted which…
Protecting innovation and not materially altering the new chemicals process was a critical part of the final compromise. Every effort was made to ensure EPA has the right tools to review new chemical substances but the amendments to this…





