I adamantly oppose the practice of illegal waterfowl baiting. It is in the best interest of sportsmen, farmers and conservationists to maintain and support a healthy population of our Nation's waterfowl all across the Nation. At the same time, however, we must also be careful to acknowledge and properly address shortcomings in the current interpretation and sometimes subjective nature of existing Federal regulations. Any misinterpretation of these regulations unintentionally prohibits legal hunting methods. This misunderstanding also prohibits agricultural producers from implementing normal agricultural practices that are essential in the preparation of next year's crops. These practices are in no way intended to bait waterfowl or undermine the Federal regulations.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of federal regulations on waterfowl hunting and agricultural practices.
Share
More from Christopher John
Mr. Chairman, last week, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced the largest fuel economy increase for light trucks in over 20 years. After studying the cost, safety, technological features, the effect on American jobs…
I rise to oppose the gentleman from California's price cap amendment. Albert Einstein is quoted as saying that the definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over and over again searching for different results. The history of…
I would like to give an overview who are the Blue Dog Democrats. Members might have heard several times about our group and how active we are, but we are a group of 33 individual Members of Congress from all over the country. We come from…
It is important to note that during the 4-year period of study, the federal lessee continued to drain the sacred reservoir and actually continued to drain the field until the Federal wells ceased producing in 1998.





