I adamantly oppose the practice of illegal waterfowl baiting. It is in the best interest of sportsmen, farmers and conservationists to maintain and support a healthy population of our Nation's waterfowl all across the Nation. At the same time, however, we must also be careful to acknowledge and properly address shortcomings in the current interpretation and sometimes subjective nature of existing Federal regulations. Any misinterpretation of these regulations unintentionally prohibits legal hunting methods. This misunderstanding also prohibits agricultural producers from implementing normal agricultural practices that are essential in the preparation of next year's crops. These practices are in no way intended to bait waterfowl or undermine the Federal regulations.
Christopher John: “I adamantly oppose the practice of illegal waterfowl baiting. It is in the best interest of sportsmen, farmers and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of federal regulations on waterfowl hunting and agricultural practices.
Share
More from Christopher John
It is important to note that during the 4-year period of study, the federal lessee continued to drain the sacred reservoir and actually continued to drain the field until the Federal wells ceased producing in 1998.
There is bipartisan, bicameral, universal support for a marriage penalty tax deduction or tax decrease. The President has it in his budget, the Democrats have it in their recommittal substitute that we will see tomorrow, the Republicans…
In short, my State is knowingly leaving money on the table in order to make a good faith effort to resolve this issue.
Why would we encourage the construction and operation of more oil and gas wells in U.S. waters than are necessary?





