It mandates that an independent counsel be appointed under circumstances where misconduct is alleged, takes away the power of the Justice Department and the criminal justice process to use other means like, for example, a grand jury, separate grand jury, separate prosecutorial discretion, on behalf of the U.S. attorney, and in addition, probably, will cause a manyfold increase in the cost of the operation of Government by mandating that every Member of Congress absolutely be covered by a statute which squeezes out other important ways to indict and convict Members of Congress; namely, the grand jury and the process involving U.S. attorneys.
Daniel Glickman: “It mandates that an independent counsel be appointed under circumstances where misconduct is alleged, takes away the…”
Editor's note · Context
Glickman discusses the implications of appointing an independent counsel for congressional misconduct.
Share
More from Daniel Glickman
I rise today to alert my colleagues to a bill I have been working on for many years, a bill which deals with liability problems affecting small airplane manufacturers. I know that many of my colleagues are familiar with this legislation…
The independence of the Committee on the Judiciary in my judgment would be threatened by a mandatory independent counsel law, and I think it should be pointed out that the Justice Department has had no trouble investigating and indicting…
I rise in support of this bill. Mr. Chairman, my constituents often tell me that they think it is important for Congress and the Government in general to improve its image, to look like we are acting like the rest of the people, to not…
Virtually every State legislature in the world has significant restrictions on gifts. The public believes on occasion we do in fact take favors, and I think this is a good first step to establish some principles that were honest and true…





