I would like to ask the gentleman, what he is saying is, he cut out all farm programs affecting wheat, corn, rice, cotton, tobacco, everything. For whatever reason, we leave dairy alone in this program, and the dairy program also on occasion costs the Government some money. I support it, but I do not understand, for the life of me, why the gentleman wants to say to the wheat farmer, the corn farmer, the rice farmer, the cotton farmer and all of the other farmers in the country that they are going to suffer. And by the way, they are in bleak economic times, as it is. The removal of these programs will probably throw thousands of farmers, if not ten of thousands, into bankruptcy. But the gentleman leaves the dairy farmer alone.
Daniel Glickman: “I would like to ask the gentleman, what he is saying is, he cut out all farm programs affecting wheat, corn, rice…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of proposed cuts to farm programs on various agricultural sectors.
Share
More from Daniel Glickman
And in fact virtually every Attorney General, Republican and Democrat, are very opposed to the provisions of the amendment that the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Gekas] is seeking which mandates that an independent counsel be appointed.
Virtually every State legislature in the world has significant restrictions on gifts. The public believes on occasion we do in fact take favors, and I think this is a good first step to establish some principles that were honest and true…
The independence of the Committee on the Judiciary in my judgment would be threatened by a mandatory independent counsel law, and I think it should be pointed out that the Justice Department has had no trouble investigating and indicting…
I think that the leadership on the subcommittee, the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bryant] particularly, but also the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Gekas] and other Republicans, were very constructive in trying to work this out as well as…





