It opens up all these possibilities by mandating to the President that he has to expand NATO and he has to look at providing foreign aid and disarmament aid to these qualifying countries. I would also argue to my colleagues that in reading through what this legislation says, we read through this and find that on page 71 of title VI, at the top of the page, these countries would be eligible for economic support assistance, they would be eligible for security assistance, and they would be eligible for nonproliferation and disarmament funds. Where in the Contract for America does it say that we are going to mandate that we expand NATO, that we list to the President of the United States all these countries that have to join, according to this legislation, in title VI, and that the American taxpayer is then going to fund this new expanded NATO? I do not think that that is what the elections in November were about. I would further argue that whether or not we intended this, the gentleman from New Jersey and I are in complete adherence to what the contract says.
Timothy Roemer: “It opens up all these possibilities by mandating to the President that he has to expand NATO and he has to look at…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing NATO expansion and foreign aid in relation to the Contract with America.
Share
More from Timothy Roemer
the bill that I referred to, as the gentlewoman from Ohio knows, was a Clinton proposal that came to the House for three different votes. It passed with bipartisan support from Democrats and Republicans working together, not excluding and…
It seems to me when the majority leader points the finger at the so-called other body for not doing its work, it comes on the tail of a workweek, so-called workweek, that we have had here of a half an hour on the floor Monday, we were out…
I want to first of all state my admiration for the sponsor of this motion. This motion is a promotion of democracy. It is for free trade and it is to replace a 40-year-old failed policy with a new idea on foreign policy. As a new Democrat…
Mr. Speaker, oftentimes motions to recommit are both partisan and procedural. This motion is neither one. It is not partisan in that it is a reflection actually of the substance of a bipartisan agreement arrived at by members of the…





