we are going to have a debate today about banning or removing the ban on such dangerous weapons as streetsweepers and AK-47's. But I, sadly, think the debate is not about the substantive issues that we are going to hear about and the danger of these guns and the safety of the citizens, but it is going to be about one thing and one thing alone. It is going to be about this; money. It is going to be about the old adage: bought lock, stock, and barrel. Locking up people's election, getting stocks and putting them back in this Chamber and stuffing money down the barrel of their guns. Now, we can either have new politics and reform about the public interests or we can continue to have these same old debates about special interests. We can either clean up our campaign coffers and get political reform, or we can continue to see the same old politics and the same old thing.
Timothy Roemer: “we are going to have a debate today about banning or removing the ban on such dangerous weapons as streetsweepers and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the influence of money in the debate over banning certain firearms.
Share
More from Timothy Roemer
I want to begin by quoting General William Sherman in the Civil War who simply stated, ``War is hell.'' And I can also say, having visited the Pentagon the night of the attacks on September 11 and visiting New York City at Ground Zero just…
Mr. Chairman, this whole debate started several months ago when the Under Secretary of State said, ``The United States believes that Cuba has at least a limited offensive biological warfare research and development effort.'' Now, one of…
I obviously rise in support, strong support, of this resolution commending the very important contribution that charter schools make to our public schools across this great land, and also to designate a week of Charter School Appreciation…
This isn't just a matter of border security--it's a matter of National security.





