The bill can be described as a blank check policy. It can be described as saying putting the contract and everything else before the horse and saying we are not sure how much this is going to cost, it might be $5 billion, it might be $8 billion, it might be $15 billion or $20 billion, but we shall deploy this system at the earliest possible date. You might even guess from the debate so far that we are not spending a dime on this system, and I would remind everybody in the Chamber that we are currently spending $2.9 billion each year, already, on these systems. So we are spending money on pursuing these different systems and giving a blank check to go forward with a system that is unproven, extremely costly and untested. Now what the Spratt amendment simply does is it says we are not going to give you a blank check, we are going to have some checks and balances to this system.
Timothy Roemer: “The bill can be described as a blank check policy. It can be described as saying putting the contract and everything…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill and the Spratt amendment regarding military spending.
Share
More from Timothy Roemer
does the majority leader think this is a priority for the House, since it is a priority of the President of the United States, to report this bipartisan bill to the entire House?
I rise to express my serious reservations about H.R. 5005, creating the new Department of Homeland Security. On the occasion of this historic vote, I wish to express my concerns about the Administration's proposal and implementing…
If this legislation were a bill to support our troops, our brave and courageous men and women overseas, fighting terrorism, it would pass unanimously, right now. If this bill were simply a bill to protect our homeland from terrorists, it…
I think that this country is in dire need of a homeland security department, and I hope and pray that the President's proposal will work. But I think that it will not. While I do not know what I am going to do yet on final passage, I have…





