This debate today is one about a fair rule to allow us cuts in corporate programs and subsidies, to help heat the kitchens and the bedrooms for senior citizens or to help pregnant women deliver healthy babies. It is about a rule that is about 70 years old. I voted against Democratic rules when they were not fair. This is the first time I have risen against a Republican rule because it is a Russian rule; not of the Russia of 1995 but of the Russia of 1925. Why not just have an up-or-down vote on this whole bill? We are not even given the opportunity to amend this. Do the American people support cutting the CIA budget of $28 billion or, as the Republicans want to do, cutting the WIC Program, cutting heating for senior citizens, cutting summer youth training programs? I do not think so. Mr. Speaker, give us the ability to make those offsetting cuts and balance the budget.
Timothy Roemer: “This debate today is one about a fair rule to allow us cuts in corporate programs and subsidies, to help heat the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the fairness of a rule related to budget cuts and amendments during a House debate.
Share
More from Timothy Roemer
It is a crescendo type activity that is causing the CIA director to have, so to speak, his hair on fire. Why aren't we seeing a commensurate reaction out of FBI and Justice to try to meet this threat?
If my children were to receive this report card, they would have to repeat a grade. We can't afford to repeat the lessons of 9/11 and the losses of 9/11.
I thank my good friend and teammate on the Cuba Working Group. We have heard mention many times today committees and communism and changing foreign policy. Months ago 23 Democrats and 23 Republicans came together, formulating ideas…
I obviously rise in support, strong support, of this resolution commending the very important contribution that charter schools make to our public schools across this great land, and also to designate a week of Charter School Appreciation…





