I am happy with the gentleman's cooperative spirit here, but would say he is willing to tackle the committee staff reductions, and I applaud that and will vote for that, but we should also tackle the personal staff issue. For Members like myself and many others who have returned $650,000 through the years, we do not want that money spent on other Members going over their mail accounts. When you decipher what you have just said, we want to be able to have that money go to the U.S. Treasury, and a simple sentence in this provision, if it was not a closed rule, could say unspent personal office funds shall be directed to the United States Treasury out of our accounts.
Timothy Roemer: “I am happy with the gentleman's cooperative spirit here, but would say he is willing to tackle the committee staff…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of unspent personal office funds during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Timothy Roemer
I thank my good friend and teammate on the Cuba Working Group. We have heard mention many times today committees and communism and changing foreign policy. Months ago 23 Democrats and 23 Republicans came together, formulating ideas…
We need one person in charge, one person with accountability, one person with responsibility and the president's ear to be able to manage, hire dire, have an appropriation budget, and direct the activities of the 15 different agencies that…
I want to emphasize that we can quantify results in a number of ways, but there is one metric we can't account for, and that is the number of lives that have been saved.
Air-conditioned garbage trucks, Anderson, and, also, body armor for dogs. How is this helping us fight the war on jihadist terrorism more effectively?





