However, as she started out the debate on this issue, she said, we as members of the committee have access, the 16 of us, and all 435 members, have access if they want. This amendment is not about that access of Members of Congress. Sometimes we think we are pretty smart; we think we know and have a lot of the answers. This is about providing one simple piece of information to the people that work hard every day to fund the overall budget, and then they get one ray of sunshine to know how the intelligence budget fits into the overall budget.
Timothy Roemer: “However, as she started out the debate on this issue, she said, we as members of the committee have access, the 16 of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of transparency in the intelligence budget during a committee debate.
Share
More from Timothy Roemer
We need to make sure that the national intelligence director is a director with strength and authority and presidential access, not a czar.
I rise to talk about why the motions to rise from the committee, offered by the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Taylor), are a valuable contribution to this House, to the democratic principles, and actually to this bill. When we started…
MPP is a thoughtful policy that protects migrants looking to the United States of America for a better life and those living in the USA.
I am proud to have voted for a successful bipartisan welfare reform in 1996. That bill has worked to get people off of welfare roles into work, and many of them out of poverty. Now we have a Republican bill that is coming to the floor…





