While I appreciate the intentions of the supporters of censure, I, nonetheless, urge Members to oppose it, because it is a fraud and assault upon the Constitution. Censure is not an authorized alternative to impeachment. Congress has the express constitutional authority to censure its own Members for misconduct, but there is no expressed authority in the Constitution for Congress to censure the President. Impeachment is the only power in the Constitution granted to Congress to address presidential misconduct and dereliction in his executive duties. The Founding Fathers set high standards for impeachment, and by also providing that conviction requires a two-thirds vote in the Senate to remove the President from office, the ensured impeachment would not become a method for Congress to harass executive or judicial officials. A censure resolution would fly in the face of the separation of powers doctrine. Congress cannot make it up as we go along.
Steve Buyer: “While I appreciate the intentions of the supporters of censure, I, nonetheless, urge Members to oppose it, because it is…”
On the recordDecember 18, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the issue of censure and its constitutional implications during a House debate.
Share
More from Steve Buyer
Dec 15, 2010
I end with this: Tolerance does not require a moral equivalency. Think about it. This is a bad thing to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
Sep 28, 2010
Well, all right. Reclaiming my time, this was a very good moment for bipartisanship, to actually bring a work product to the floor that we could all agree on. And I am greatly disappointed, Bob, that you made that judgment call. But this…
Nov 17, 2010
I only wish your conference had made you chairman of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, I really do, because you and I could have done a lot of great things together. In reality, the unwritten history will be the success of the committee…





