Having said that, Mr. President, let me state my opposition to the second amendment offered by the distinguished Senator from North Dakota. His amendment would, in fact, undo the entire effort we have achieved with India over the past year. Not only would he revise India's civilian military separation plan with his amendment, but he would require India to assume the obligations of a nuclear weapons state under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the NPT. This is, in effect, a perfect killer amendment.
Dick Lugar: “Having said that, Mr. President, let me state my opposition to the second amendment offered by the distinguished Senator…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to U.S.-India nuclear cooperation during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Dick Lugar
There is precedent for using patient diplomacy to resolve treaty violations.
In the likely event the INF Treaty collapses in August, the only remaining bilateral U.S.-Russia arms control agreement would be New START, which expires in 2021 but can be extended by up to five years through agreement by both parties.
jettisoning treaties that provide a legal framework for exposing Russian violations achieves nothing.
on behalf of myself as ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Senator James Inhofe, the ranking member of the East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee, I rise today to commemorate the 85th birthday anniversary of His…





