Mr. Speaker, I rise to wholeheartedly support this common-sense resolution. The U.S. and European Union, as we have heard, established arms embargoes against the People's Republic of China following the June, 1989, Tiananmen Square Massacre. The U.S embargo continues today in light of the widespread human rights abuses that continue under the Communist regime. But the European Union, in a move that can only be described as reckless, is moving to lift its ban on weapons sales. EU states are even today selling China so-called nonlethal technologies that enhance its offensive capabilities. Advanced radar systems sold to China, for example, allow its military to better target U.S. warships and aircraft. For this reason, I introduced in the defense authorization bill last year a provision to prohibit the Defense Department from buying weapons from foreign companies that sell weapons to the People's Republic of China. My measure, which passed the House, also would have made it U.S. policy to deny China defense technology that could threaten the U.S. or destabilize the Western Pacific region. Unfortunately, this provision was dropped in conference as a result of Senate objections.
John Hostettler: “Mr. Speaker, I rise to wholeheartedly support this common-sense resolution. The U.S. and European Union, as we have…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the European Union's decision to lift arms embargoes against China.
Share
More from John Hostettler
First of all, Mr. Jefferson was in France during the approval process of the Bill of Rights.
eliminating these authorities, as this amendment would do, would mean that we can get library records for run-of-the-mill criminal investigations with a grand jury subpoena that does not require a court order or judicial review, and it…
I felt it necessary to clarify the discussion somewhat in that, as I have heard the discussion, it has focused on some issues that the bill does not cover, as well as does not discuss some of the issues that the bill is attempting to…
The amendment strikes the language in this bill that gives preferential treatment to pilots who were former military or former law enforcement personnel. It is correct, Mr. Chairman, that there is a preference only, but if we want a…





