I felt it necessary to clarify the discussion somewhat in that, as I have heard the discussion, it has focused on some issues that the bill does not cover, as well as does not discuss some of the issues that the bill is attempting to remedy. First of all, the words from the gentleman from Texas suggested that this bill had to do with the first 16 words of the first amendment. That is not true. The first 16 words to the first amendment say the following: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." It has been concluded that there are essentially two clauses to that portion of the first amendment. First is the so-called Establishment Clause and the second is the Free Exercise Clause. This bill addresses the issue of the Establishment Clause and the attorney's fees awarded as a result of cases brought regarding Establishment Clauses. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the Free Exercise Clause, the last portion of the gentleman from Texas' 16 words to the first amendment.
John Hostettler: “I felt it necessary to clarify the discussion somewhat in that, as I have heard the discussion, it has focused on some…”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying the scope of a bill related to the Establishment Clause during floor debate.
Share
More from John Hostettler
on June 26, 2002, in Newdow v. U.S. Congress, a three-member panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a California school district's policy and practice of voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance was…
The amendment ensures that the program proposed by this act will be carried out expeditiously by requiring that at least 20 percent of the pilots who volunteer during the first month be trained and deputized not more than 6 months after…
And I can understand that concern, but let me remind you that the awards act came in 1976. In 1962, the United States Supreme Court struck down the notion of school prayer without the attorneys fees award act. In 1963, the Supreme Court…





