there are two things, in response, if I can reclaim my time. First, is we have required offsets for every transfer of funds. This amendment is not accompanied by offsets. Second, I recognize that this is a good way to fund these kinds of projects. But we simply have not got funds in that program, and if we put these funds in that the gentleman is requesting in his amendment, there is no assurance that the San Diego project would be able to receive them.
Jasper Packard: “there are two things, in response, if I can reclaim my time. First, is we have required offsets for every transfer of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding and offsets related to an amendment for a project in San Diego.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
I rise in support of H.R. 4101, The Agriculture Appropriations Act of 1999. I want to specifically acknowledge the provision which allots $1 million for pesticide and crop disease research. This will directly benefit Southern California…
the Gilchrest amendment seeks to zero out funding for the Baltimore Channel and Channels navigation channel maintenance and straightening project. This is an ongoing project which was funded in the current fiscal year, and the proposed…
I want to correct, what I hope is a misunderstanding. We have never had in this bill funding for the Northeast energy oil problem. That funding is in the Subcommittee on Interior, not in this bill. So we not only did not knock it out, it…
the gentleman is correct. If any committee of Congress wishes to take action regarding the off-site disposal issue the Commission is now considering, it ought to be the relevant authorization committee of the House that does it. I would…





