The language, we worked hard to get the appropriate language in this bill. The language simply authorizes the Architect of the Capitol to consummate the sale under the direction of the House Office Building Commission, but it does not create the sale. We do not consummate the sale in the language of this bill. It leaves that judgment yet to the leadership of the House. Frankly, we think it is good language that still leaves the option open whether it is right to sell property or not. We are not selling property in the language in this bill.
Jasper Packard: “The language, we worked hard to get the appropriate language in this bill. The language simply authorizes the Architect…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the language of a bill regarding the sale of property by the Architect of the Capitol.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
I understand the idea of an interbasin transfer has been discussed in Northwest Georgia, and I assure the gentleman from Georgia the subcommittee understands the serious nature of any interbasin transfer of this magnitude and would be very…
I appreciate the request of the gentleman. I will certainly work in conference to adequately fund the Spallation Neutron Source and, of course, additional funds if that will help.
This bill is $60 million on alternative fuels more than last year's, so we have not neglected that area. We have raised it even from where it was as it passed out of the House.
Reclaiming my time, the $2 billion figure has been thrown around several times today. It is an inaccurate figure. We have increased the funding for this bill to the tune of $1.6 billion, not $2 billion. But the fact is we have readdressed…





