The Ryan amendment would take $74 million from the National Ignition Facility and terminate the project; that is premature. We are aware that the project has not run smoothly, and that it has had its problems both management and fiscally on schedule, but some of this funding will be needed, whether the committee agrees to complete NIF or not. If the decision is made to cancel NIF, the funds will be needed for termination costs.
Jasper Packard: “The Ryan amendment would take $74 million from the National Ignition Facility and terminate the project; that is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Ryan amendment on the National Ignition Facility funding.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
Reclaiming my time, the $2 billion figure has been thrown around several times today. It is an inaccurate figure. We have increased the funding for this bill to the tune of $1.6 billion, not $2 billion. But the fact is we have readdressed…
I would like to stand in support of H.J. Res. 37, which will make it more difficult to raise taxes. It is time Congress puts a stop to the raid on the pocket books of American citizens. H.J. Res. 37 will require a two-thirds supermajority…
I rise in support of H.R. 1554, the Satellite Home Viewer Act. Satellite television subscribers should have the same rights as cable subscribers when it comes to receiving network broadcast signals. The Satellite Home Viewer Act will give…
I would like to rise today in support of our troops in the Persian Gulf. In my mind, there is no more honorable duty than that of our members of the armed services. Since the close of the Persian Gulf War, Iraq has repeatedly refused to…





