His proclamation had no present legal effect within territory not under the control of our arms; but as an expression of the spirit of the people and the policy of the Administration, it had become both a moral and a military necessity.
George Julian: “His proclamation had no present legal effect within territory not under the control of our arms; but as an expression of…”
Editor's note · Context
Julian describes the proclamation as lacking immediate legal effect but emphasizes its moral and military significance during the war.
Share
More from George Julian
The tyranny of industrial domination, which borrows its life from the alliance of concentrated capital with labor-saving machinery, must be overthrown.
The system of spoils and plunder must also be destroyed, in order that freedom itself may be rescued from the perilous activities quickened into life by its own spirit, and the conduct of public affairs inspired by the great moralities…
The withdrawal of the slavery question from the strife of parties has changed the face of our politics as completely as did its introduction.
He carried his religion courageously into politics, and while arraigning slavery as the grand rebel, he also severely criticised the management of the war and the Border State policy of the President.





