Broadly speaking, slavery and free trade, State banking and debtors' relief laws were arraigned on the side of Localism; while slavery restriction, national banking, a protective tariff, and security of contract were marshaled beneath the banner of Nationalism.
Albert Beveridge: “Broadly speaking, slavery and free trade, State banking and debtors' relief laws were arraigned on the side of Localism…”
Editor's note · Context
This statement contrasts localism and nationalism, highlighting the political divisions of the time.
Share
More from Albert Beveridge
In the excitement produced by ardent controversy, gentlemen view the same object through such different media that minds, not infrequently receive therefrom precisely opposite impressions.
There can be little doubt that a majority of the people did not favor the Constitution when adopted by the Convention and ratified by the States.
The Richmond Whig and Public Advertiser said that "no man has lived or died in this country, save its father George Washington alone, who united such a warmth of affection for his person, with so deep and unaffected a respect for his…
To Marshall reared--the great, the good, the wise; Born for all ages, honored in all skies; His was the fame to mortals rarely given, Begun on earth, but fixed in aim on heaven.





