I am wondering if it is the understanding of the gentleman that under this bill there is no general prohibition of exports to a country which is deemed to contain responsible entities who are committing religious persecutions, as defined by the director of the Office of Religious Persecution Monitoring, but rather, the ban on export covers only those to the responsible entities themselves?
Questioning the provisions of a bill related to religious persecution and export bans.
Share
More from Thomas Ewing
The gentleman knows, I am sure, that sugar prices are at an all-time low; they have not been this low in years.
So there is no provision in this act that would punish the farmer or exporter if the product exported eventually reached a responsible entity?
The last speaker talked about the census. There is one overriding requirement for the census, that it follow the constitutional mandate for an actual count. Now, all the great things that have been said about doing it the other way really…
As included in the bill before us, the core principles will be, by their nature, flexible standards. Accordingly, a regulated entity would have reasonable discretion in making determinations as to how it will meet these requirements…
Other voices in this conversation
