I thank the chairman for a job well done. I would just like to say a couple things about the peanut and sugar program, which were under my subcommittee. First, these programs will not cost the taxpayer one dollar. Yes, without these programs, you might have a lot more cost to the consumers in this country. I would remind the gentlewoman from New York, who was so critical of these programs, that these programs were so bureaucratic after decades of being controlled on that side of the aisle in farm programs that it would have truly been unfair to the people who farm and grow peanuts and sugar in America, a lot of little people, had we cut their legs off at the knees and expected them to go out of these programs immediately. These are a good transition to the marketplace.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the peanut and sugar program during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Thomas Ewing
But the problem is for American agriculture that we have to compete worldwide. U.S. agriculture exported exports in excess of $55 billion in 1998, resulting in a trade surplus of $25 billion which generated over $100 billion in related…
it is much easier to be a liberal than to be a conservative. Just consider for a moment what has been said by our colleagues on the other side during the debate on managed care over the past 2 weeks. The pattern here, you can see on almost…
as a co-sponsor of this important legislation, I urge my fellow colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support H.R. 221. The bill amends the Fair Labor & Standards Act to allow youths between the ages of 14-18, who are members of a…
today we gather in this House, we have things pretty good; but sometimes when things are too rosy, we lose track of where we are headed, and maybe what we ought to be looking at. The surplus is certainly something that we are glad to have…





