According to the letter from the Congress of American Indians, we are going to need approximately $300 million to take care of all of the needs of all of the tribes under this program. Mr. Chairman, $26 million, of course, as the gentleman from Mississippi pointed out, is a pittance. But the problem, as I see it, is lack of money. We just do not have enough money in this bill to take care of all of the tribes. I am told by staff there are 30 tribes that have not received any money under this arrangement. I do not think that is fair, either, just as the gentleman points out that the new distribution would severely penalize the tribe in his district. But the Congress is trying to find out, it does not agree with the $300 million figure. What it is trying to do is find out how much money is actually needed. That is why I suggested earlier, as we go into the conference, I for one, and I am sure the chairman too, will try to find out how much money is realistically available.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing funding needs for Native American tribes during a discussion on a related bill.
Share
More from Sidney Yates
Why, then, Mr. Chairman, I would ask the gentleman, is his party advocating the tax reduction bill? Will that not increase the deficit?
the gentleman from Guam has expressed his interest in having $300,000 of those funds allocated to establish a War Restitution Study Commission to verify claims from the people of Guam for the purpose of determining amounts of individual…
I certainly agree with the statement made by the distinguished gentleman from Illinois. My district also will suffer from the lack of Section 8 housing. As the gentleman said so eloquently, there is no shortage in the need for Section 8…
may I say that I do not consider it a big windfall. I think that the tribe, on the basis of the explanation given by the gentleman from Mississippi, deserves that money, but to do so at the present time without having all of the figures…





