It is interesting that even the lead witness in opposition to the balanced budget amendment last year, Prof. Laurence Tribe of Harvard--I do not want to mislead anyone. He is still opposed to the balanced budget amendment, but he said this: Despite the misgivings I expressed on this score a decade ago, I no longer think that a balanced budget amendment is at a conceptual level an unsuited kind of provision to include in the Constitution. The Jeffersonian notion that today's populace should not be able to burden future generations with excessive debt does seem to be the kind of fundamental value that is worthy of enshrinement in the Constitution. In a sense, it represents a structural protection for the rights of our children and grandchildren. Madam President, the last time we voted on this in the Senate after significant debate was 1986. It failed to carry the Senate by one vote. The argument used then was we can balance the budget without a constitutional amendment. It is very interesting that we are hearing the same arguments today. At that point we had, with the approval of a Republican President of the United States, taken some steps to reduce the deficit a little, and now we have taken steps to the great credit of President Clinton to reduce the deficit. But in 1986, the deficit was $2 trillion. Now the deficit is $4.5 trillion. And we are hearing the same arguments.…
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the balanced budget amendment and its implications for future generations.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
I rise today to recognize a special milestone in science and our understanding of nature. Scientists at Illinois' own Fermilab have found the first direct evidence of the top quark, the sixth and last component of a standard model of…
It ought to be a very rare thing. We can't just be an international Rambo wandering around doing whatever we want regardless of international law.
I am pleased to submit this resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the recent tragic events in Rwanda. I am joined in this effort by Senators Jeffords, Kassebaum, Kennedy, Feingold, Wofford, and Pell. On April 6, 1994…
Judge Barkett, from every evidence I have seen--and I have gone through the record, I was there for part of the hearing--is eminently well qualified. The charge that she is soft on crime, or does not favor the death penalty--that really…





