I would like at this point to address the amendment offered by my friend from Washington, who is a solid substantial Member of this body. But once in a while he can go astray, just like once in a while Paul Simon can go astray, or even Senators from Vermont or Nevada or other places can go astray. First of all, I agree with the Senator from Washington that we have had too many programs. The 154 figure he used includes the guaranteed student loan programs and a lot of others that I do not think really fit into this measure. But I join Senator Kennedy. The two of us asked for a GAO report on this very question. We received a report the last day of January and we will hold hearings next month on this question. I might add that in the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, on which he and I serve, I introduced an amendment that permits, on Indian reservations, a consolidation of this program as of October 1. That is now the law. We will have at least the opportunity for some experimentation in consolidation of some of the programs. But there are serious flaws in this amendment. First of all, it undercuts the ability to have unsubsidized employment programs under this. It is very interesting, the chamber of commerce supports this bill right now as does the National Manufacturers Association. They are not asking for this subsidy. I do not think we ought to provide it.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses an amendment related to employment programs and consolidation on Indian reservations.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
I thank my colleagues, particularly Senator Kennedy, the chairman of the committee, and Senator Durenberger, who has been very helpful on this, as well as other things. We would not have the Direct Lending Program today but for Senator…
Judge Barkett, from every evidence I have seen--and I have gone through the record, I was there for part of the hearing--is eminently well qualified. The charge that she is soft on crime, or does not favor the death penalty--that really…
first, two points made by my friend--and he is my friend--from Nevada, Senator Reid, on the language of our amendment. We have gone over this carefully in all kinds of hearings. The only language change is the Danforth language on judicial…
just in response to one item mentioned by my friend from Tennessee. He and I agree on Social Security. We differ on the Reid amendment. When he talks about 110 percent of debt versus GDP in 1945 after World War II, what that ignores is…





