last May, nearly a year ago, my colleagues Mr. Meehan, Senator Feingold and I introduced the first lobbying reform legislation in the Congress. It has the support of Public Citizen, Common Cause, and non-partisan scholars like Norm Ornstein and Tom Mann, none of whom support the bill that is on the floor today. We said then it would take bipartisan cooperation to get real reform. This legislation has chosen politics above progress, business as usual, rather than breaking the gridlock of the special interests. Today, we are considering the incredible shrinking bill. With each passing day, it has become weaker and smaller. If we were going to vote on it tomorrow, it probably would be a blank page. The Washington Post calls it a ``watered down sham,'' ``simply a joke,'' ``diluted snake oil,'' and ``an insult to voters who the GOP apparently believes are dumb enough to be snookered by this feint.'' The New York Times called it a ``laughingstock'' and ``an election year con.'' Republican Congressman Hefley, the former chairman of the Ethics Committee representing the Republican Caucus, said, ``In terms of ethic process reform, I don't think we have much of that here. And I think actually we are missing an opportunity here.'' Of the restrictive rule, he said, ``The bottom line for me is why can we not have debate and vote on these issues and a number of others?…
Share
More from Rep. Rahm Emanuel
And the way this was discovered was on a worker who was laid off with 10,000 employees, went to go collect unemployment insurance and was told no, you don't have the money for that because you didn't pay insurance. He said no, I work for…
Okay. I come from a family. I believe politics is a good thing, because we have differences, and you work them out on election day and the American people make a decision, except for when you do special redistricting. But usually you let…
It's ironic that it took 4 years to close this offshore loophole. But we are shutting it down and paying for all these other benefits to ensure that this company and other companies like it who set up in the Cayman Islands do not go around…
First of all, it wasn't part of welfare reform. Welfare reform had a 1-year transitional for Medicaid. It wasn't part of that, which is a point you made. Second is, SCHIP was so successful, while the rest of the population actually had an…





