What do you think, given they have projected, I think it is $1.8 trillion over the next 10 years that seniors will be spending on medications, but if we had access to this bill and it was in place, what would be the savings to both the elderly as well as to the taxpayer, projected?
Rep. Rahm Emanuel: “What do you think, given they have projected, I think it is $1.8 trillion over the next 10 years that seniors will be…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the projected savings of a bill related to senior medication costs.
Share
More from Rep. Rahm Emanuel
I do appreciate your conversion on the road to Damascus as it relates to fiscal responsibility and spending. And I do believe that after we've seen the highest increase in the Nation's debt in the shortest period of time under a Republican…
Question number one to the minority whip, I would say to you that, of course, there are three branches of government. I don't think anybody in room or in the Chamber needs that explanation. It is the Vice President's lawyer that needs that…
Here it states, ``37 million Americans get their daily drinking water.'' It's the largest body of fresh water in North America. In fact, it's 90 percent of the water as it relates to body water. In that effort, this is a bipartisan effort…
I would like to say that it's true, there is an important constitutional precedent here, and that's why the Vice President should never have claimed that he wasn't part of the executive branch, something any eighth grader knows.





