On the recordMay 24, 2011
Well, it will be if you determine what is in the essential package.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Shimkus questions the implications of defining essential health benefits as mandates.
Share
More from John Shimkus
Jul 27, 2020
Would your organizations support Federal legislation that would likely result in EPA being forced to regulate numerous contaminants that are present in low concentrations, irrespective of whether such regulation offers meaningful public…
Jul 13, 2020
It is no surprise that we have the law of the land for failure of the appropriators to spend the money.
Jul 27, 2020
Thirty-five years ago, Congress decided EPA was not regulating enough contaminants in drinking water.
Sep 15, 2020
The American people overwhelmingly agree. Recent polling found Americans prioritize affordability and reliability over emissions reductions.
Other voices in this conversation
