Would your organizations support Federal legislation that would likely result in EPA being forced to regulate numerous contaminants that are present in low concentrations, irrespective of whether such regulation offers meaningful public health protection?
Shimkus questions the support for federal regulations on low-concentration contaminants without clear health benefits.
Share
More from John Shimkus
It is no surprise that we have the law of the land for failure of the appropriators to spend the money.
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must promptly continue with the legally mandated licensing process
As ranking member on the Subcommittee of Environment and Climate Change, I want to thank Chief Counsel Mary Martin, Deputy Chief Counsel Jerry Couri, and senior professional staff member, Peter Spencer, for their tremendous support of me…
Thirty-five years ago, Congress decided EPA was not regulating enough contaminants in drinking water.
Other voices in this conversation
