No immediate hazard, and the EPA went on record as saying that?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the EPA's assessment of coal ash disposal sites.
Share
More from John Shimkus
Would your organizations support Federal legislation that would likely result in EPA being forced to regulate numerous contaminants that are present in low concentrations, irrespective of whether such regulation offers meaningful public…
You know, the clock keeps ticking, and before you know it, my time as a Member of Congress will end, so I need to start now saying thank you to some of those folks who have committed their lives in helping me and supporting me in my…
I think it would be helpful if we would focus on the ones that we know are bad, the PFOA and PFOS.
So, to keep cost out of this debate is ridiculous, because it does cost money to meet these standards, and when you try to cheap out, you hurt the very people that you are supposed to locally protect.





