I appreciate the ranking member's accepting the amendment. We do think it improves the bill. I would like to yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gene Green).
Share & report
More from John Shimkus
I want to start talking about science and jurisdiction and why it is important to go through regular order. We just heard my colleagues talk about PFAS or PFOS or PFOA, three different things that mean three different things. What my…
We support the amendment because we think it is important to have a national risk communication strategy. We get troubled and we get confused in this debate when we are going to declare 7,866 chemicals toxic without doing the basic…
I appreciate my friend and colleague from Michigan. He has been very active on this issue for many years now, and I respect his intensity and his efforts. A couple of things, because a lot of the debate was initially just on the overall…
And if it is toxic, which means it would be defined as harmful to a baby, why are we using it in a baby to fix the heart?





