My amendment is a commonsense, simple amendment that will bring fairness to FEMA's remapping process. If my amendment is adopted, FEMA would not be able to adjust premium rates or require the purchase of flood insurance until all remapping has been completed for an entire district of the Corps of Engineers affected by the remapping. Under the current system, one geographic area of a floodplain or watershed can be updated, while another geographic area of the same floodplain or watershed may not be remapped for a few years. If you look at the St. Louis area, preliminary maps will be available for review in December of this year for the Illinois side of the Mississippi River, but will not be available for the Missouri side of the river for two to three years. The remapping process should not be stopped, but remapping should be implemented for the entire floodplain or watershed together, as opposed to the current piecemeal approach. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to improve FEMA's flood insurance remapping process.
Share
More from Jerry F. Costello
Given that there are other high-risk, hazardous industries such as the nuclear power industry, that do not have similar shared risks, why is it necessary for the Federal Government to continue this structure for the commercial space launch…
There is a mismatch between what we expect NASA to do and how much we fund it.
These contributions will save fuel and reduce noise by enabling more efficient arrivals and are evidence of how investments in research today will produce significant dividends tomorrow.
I am concerned with NASA's reversal in its commercial crew acquisition strategy--using Space Act Agreements (SAA), instead of Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)-based contracts for design activities and its possible affect on astronaut…





