Did Samantha Dravis urge you to abandon the potential deal with Senator Carper?
Janice Schakowsky
The Public Record
Janice D. Schakowsky is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Illinois's 9th congressional district since 1999. A member of the Democratic Party, she has been a prominent advocate for various progressive issues, including healthcare reform, women's rights, and consumer protection. Schakowsky has played a significant role in shaping policies related to social justice and economic equality throughout her tenure in Congress.
The evidence is clear: you have failed as a steward of American taxpayer dollars and our environment.
It isn't the first time in public service that you have upgraded your official vehicle.
I expect the courts will agree that many, if not all, of these actions are unjustified.
But the Agency's political leadership is pursuing a different agenda and the mounting evidence of serious ethics violations...
Well, these all ifs, but have you actually enforced some? Can you tell me about that?
The United States of America has very few real regulations when it comes to data privacy and security.
Current CFIUS review is inadequate to capture the various ways a foreign interest may try to access sensitive American technologies.
We must consider whether the current safeguards for our national security and our nation's workers are sufficient.
Your conduct as Administrator has demonstrated a lack of respect for American taxpayers and the Agency you were appointed to lead.
At this point, we must ask if the Inspector General will have the resources needed to investigate the Administrator's seemingly endless misconduct.
Senator Carper has stated on the basis of information, I believe, from a whistleblower, has stated that he worked with you on a deal to preserve fuel efficiency standards.
How much was Samantha Dravis paid for the 3 months during which she did not report to work?
The evidence is clear. You have failed as a steward of American taxpayer dollars and our environment.
I would ask my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to imagine, if a Democrat acted in this manner, would you stand for it?
The truth is that giving ISPs the ability to play gatekeeper only benefits the ISPs and their shareholders--and significantly HURTS innovators and consumers.
I am deeply concerned that as we move forward in a world without the Open Internet Rules, ISPs will once again act in anticompetitive ways intended to tamp down competition and consolidate their hold over their customers.
Like baseball, these markets cannot function without clear rules and a ref to call balls and strikes.
I'm concerned that many of the changes to Mr. Bennett's written submission were of a substantive and factual nature.
I hope to work with my friends on the other side of the aisle to make our bill bipartisan as well.
Our CRA would reinstate the 2015 Open Internet Rules and restore the FCC to its expert oversight role over ISPs network practices.
If enacted, the balanced budget amendment would undercut the structure of Medicare and Medicaid by opening both to dramatic cuts in funding.
I've been in close touch with the mayor of San Juan who-- and I was watching some clips the other day where FEMA, a woman representing FEMA, said that Puerto Rico was a 'good news story.' This was when people were dying, without…