my congressional district encompasses O'Hare International Airport and many of the residential communities that surround O'Hare, communities, I might add, that will lose hundreds, if not thousands, of homes and businesses to airport development should this expansion plan be approved. Please do not be deceived because this bill is on the Suspension Calendar. As the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Jackson) said, it is highly controversial, involves constitutional issues, antitrust issues, environmental issues and, most seriously, the issue of bulldozing an entire community of low-income homes, largely peopled by the Hispanic population. Northern Illinois does need additional airport capacity; everyone agrees to that. O'Hare is at capacity. So the real question is whether we build a new airport that is safe and can expand with time, or whether we refurbish the old airport. The proponents of this bill that the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Kirk) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski) are advancing want to double the amount of flights going into the busiest airport in the world each year to accommodate 1,600,000 operations a year. Opponents like the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Jackson) and myself say, build a new airport. Build one far away from urban areas that will not do violence to the environment and one that can expand as the future of our air traffic grows.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the controversial expansion plan for O'Hare International Airport and its impact on local communities.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I simply want to say, in response to my friend, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Lee), that contempt is not animating our legislation, and I really question the wisdom of penetrating motives, which seems to be a habit with some people…
someone once said brevity is the soul of eloquence. I shall attempt to emulate that by saying we are happy to accept this excellent amendment.
Well, I will not abuse the privilege. Let us get the whole story out on Mr. Gingrich, what he says about withholding. On Wednesday, at the press conference held with himself and Senator Mitchell, Mr. Gingrich stated that he ``supports Mr…
this is a killer amendment. If you vote for it, you vote to kill this entire initiative, because this imposes limits on India's nuclear weapons program, but India already possesses nuclear weapons and is extremely unlikely to give them up…





